Vejen til fred i Libyen:

Gadaffi må fjernes

Vejen til fred? I Libyen er den ikke så ligeud som her. Gammel M3-tank fra Den anden Verdenskrig i den libyske ørken.
Vejen til fred? I Libyen er den ikke så ligeud som her. Gammel M3-tank fra Den anden Verdenskrig i den libyske ørken.

JERUSALEM (15.04.2011): Libyens diktator igennem snart 42 år, oberst Muammar Gadaffi, er krigerisk og uforsonlig i sine egne offentlige taler til sin befolkning og resten af verden. Samtidig har han kørt hele sit diplomatiske korps i stilling for at forsøge at finde en løsning på borgerkrigen, som på den ene eller den anden måde sikrer hans fortsatte greb om magten.

 
 
Præsidenterne Nicolas Sarkozy og Barack Obama med premierminister David Cameron

Flere lande i den NATO-ledede koalitionsstyrke begynder at overveje, om en forhandlingsløsning måske er at foretrække, også selvom det måske betyder, at Gadaffi ikke forsvinder… i denne omgang i hvert fald. En lang række afrikanske nationer har indledt en politisk kampagne til fordel for diktatoren, men det skyldes sikkert mere, at kontinentet selv er så rigt på andre tyranner og autokrater.

USA's præsident Barack Obama, Storbritanniens premierminister David Cameron og ikke mindst Frankrigs præsident Nicolas Sarkozy er derimod stålsatte. Muammar Gafaddi er færdig. Spørgsmålet er blot, om han forlader Libyen frivilligt, eller om han skal bæres ud.

De tre ledere har tilsyneladende siddet og hygget sig omkring kaminen i Det hvide Hus, og i fællesskab forfattet en lille kronik, som de har fået The New York Times til at trykke.

Jeg tror nu også, at jeg, hvis jeg fik en artikel fra de tre herrer, ville trykke den her på hjemmesiden. Men, de sender desværre ikke deres skriverier tiol mig, så i stedet genoptrykker jeg her de tre’s kronik fra The New York Times.

Kilde:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/opinion/15iht-edlibya15.html?ref=global


 
 
US President Barack Obama, President Nicolas Sarkozy of France and British PM David Cameron

Libya’s Pathway to Peace

By Barack Obama, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy
The New York Times
April 14, 2011

Together with our NATO allies and coalition partners, the United States, France and Britain have been united from the start in responding to the crisis in Libya, and we are united on what needs to happen in order to end it.

Even as we continue our military operations today to protect civilians in Libya, we are determined to look to the future. We are convinced that better times lie ahead for the people of Libya, and a pathway can be forged to achieve just that.

We must never forget the reasons why the international community was obliged to act in the first place. As Libya descended into chaos with Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi attacking his own people, the Arab League called for action. The Libyan opposition called for help. And the people of Libya looked to the world in their hour of need. In an historic resolution, the United Nations Security Council authorized all necessary measures to protect the people of Libya from the attacks upon them. By responding immediately, our countries, together with an international coalition, halted the advance of Qaddafi’s forces and prevented the bloodbath that he had promised to inflict upon the citizens of the besieged city of Benghazi.

Tens of thousands of lives have been protected. But the people of Libya are still suffering terrible horrors at Qaddafi’s hands each and every day. His rockets and shells rained down on defenseless civilians in Ajdabiya. The city of Misurata is enduring a medieval siege, as Qaddafi tries to strangle its population into submission. The evidence of disappearances and abuses grows daily.

 
 
He can leave by himself, or be carried out, but the future of Libya is without Muammar Qaddafi

Our duty and our mandate under U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973 is to protect civilians, and we are doing that. It is not to remove Qaddafi by force. But it is impossible to imagine a future for Libya with Qaddafi in power. The International Criminal Court is rightly investigating the crimes committed against civilians and the grievous violations of international law. It is unthinkable that someone who has tried to massacre his own people can play a part in their future government. The brave citizens of those towns that have held out against forces that have been mercilessly targeting them would face a fearful vengeance if the world accepted such an arrangement. It would be an unconscionable betrayal.

Furthermore, it would condemn Libya to being not only a pariah state, but a failed state too. Qaddafi has promised to carry out terrorist attacks against civilian ships and airliners. And because he has lost the consent of his people any deal that leaves him in power would lead to further chaos and lawlessness. We know from bitter experience what that would mean. Neither Europe, the region, or the world can afford a new safe haven for extremists.

There is a pathway to peace that promises new hope for the people of Libya — a future without Qaddafi that preserves Libya’s integrity and sovereignty, and restores her economy and the prosperity and security of her people. This needs to begin with a genuine end to violence, marked by deeds not words. The regime has to pull back from the cities it is besieging, including Ajdabiya, Misurata and Zintan, and return to their barracks. However, so long as Qaddafi is in power, NATO must maintain its operations so that civilians remain protected and the pressure on the regime builds. Then a genuine transition from dictatorship to an inclusive constitutional process can really begin, led by a new generation of leaders. In order for that transition to succeed, Qaddafi must go and go for good. At that point, the United Nations and its members should help the Libyan people as they rebuild where Qaddafi has destroyed — to repair homes and hospitals, to restore basic utilities, and to assist Libyans as they develop the institutions to underpin a prosperous and open society.

NATO and its allies are committed to ousting Qaddafi. But it is the Libyan people who must decide their own future. This vision for the future of Libya has the support of a broad coalition of countries, including many from the Arab world. These countries came together in London on March 29 and founded a Contact Group which met this week in Doha to support a solution to the crisis that respects the will of the Libyan people.

Today, NATO and our partners are acting in the name of the United Nations with an unprecedented international legal mandate. But it will be the people of Libya, not the U.N., who choose their new constitution, elect their new leaders, and write the next chapter in their history.

Britain, France and the United States will not rest until the United Nations Security Council resolutions have been implemented and the Libyan people can choose their own future.

 

Barack Obama is the 44th president of the United States. David Cameron is prime minister of Britain and Nicolas Sarkozy is president of France.


 
Tilføj kommentar