Nahum Barnea om Netanyahu:

Men han taler fantastisk godt engelsk

JERUSALEM (05.03.2015): Israels premierminister Benyamin Netanyahu imponerer. Det gør han altid… når han taler. Han er en stor orator. En ordets folkeforfører… og så taler han et fantastisk engelsk, og det gør hans partifæller og mange andre israelere bløde i knæene. Måske fordi de fejlagtigt sætter lighedstegn mellem ords korrekte udtale og visdommen bag.
 
Benyamin Netanyahus forældre flyttede til USA, da han var lille, og han har gået i amerikanske skoler og begyndte sin karriere som møbelsælger i det amerikanske. Derfor taler han amerikansk engelsk og optræder, i hvert fald i mange israeleres øjne, som den store verdensmand. I den sammenhæng er Israel (ligesom Danmark) lidt af en landsby, hvis befolkning er nemme at imponere, når nogen af deres egne gør sig internationalt.
 
Problemet er bare, at Netanyahu tilsyneladende også selv tror, at han bedre end de fleste, og at han mere end andre forstår amerikanerne og den måde deres politiske system fungerer på. At han kan spille spillet. Bruge det til sin egen og til Israels fordel. 
 
Engelsk er afgjort Netanyahus stærke side. Selverkendelse og ydmyghed er det ikke.
 
 
Netanyahu i Den amerikanske Kongres. Var hans tale mere israelsk valgkamp end et forsøg på at stoppe atom-aftalen med Iran?

Nøjagtigt på samme måde, som han nu sætter sit eget og måske også hele Israels forhold til ”den frie verdens mest magtfulde mand”, USA’s præsident Barack Obama overstyr, gjorde han også i sin tid med præsident Bill Clinton, da han som nyudnævnt israelsk premierminister begyndte at spille amerikansk indenrigspolitik i Kongressen imod præsident Clinton og Det Hvide Hus. 
 
Det var i Netanyahus første periode som premierminister i sidste halvdel af 90’erne, og da kunne man måske til en vis grad undskylde det med hans manglende erfaring. 
 
Det kan man ikke længere. 
 
Nu er gentagelsen tværtimod skræmmende.
 
For enten lærer han ikke af sine fejltagelser, og det er i sig selv alarmerende nok. Men hvis han på forhånd kender resultatet, og bare er ligeglad, fordi hans mål i virkeligheden er et helt andet, end det han påstår, nemlig blot at vinde stemmer i den hjemlige israelske valgkamp, så er den israelske premierminister kynisk i forfærdende grad.
 
Hvis der er én israelsk kommentator, jeg altid læser, selvom han ikke skriver for Haaretz, så er det Yediot Ahronot’s Nahum Barnea. Han er utrolig velinformeret, har fantastiske kilder, en eminent analytisk sans, er uinteresseret i at stille nogen, heller ikke magthaverne, tilfreds, er altid kritisk, og man bliver bestandigt klogere af at læse ham.
 
 
Yediot Ahronot's Nahum Barnea, en af israelsk allerbedste politiske kommentatorer.

I sin klumme denne uge fortæller Barnea, som var med premierministeren i USA, om vreden i Det Hvide Hus og blandt Kongressens demokratiske medlemmer. I særdeleshed demokraternes leder i Repræsentanternes Hus Nancy Pelosi, som ellers altid regnes for en af Israels mest trofaste venner. Efter Netanyahus tale udsendte hun en pressemeddelelse, hvori hun skriver, at hun blev ”bedrøvet over den fornærmelse imod USA’s intelligens”, som talen var udtryk for.
 
Nahum Barnea iagttog fra tilskuerpladserne i galleriet Nancy Pelosi under den israelske premierministers tale, og han skriver, at hun efter et stykke tid ikke længere rejste sig op under de begejstrede klapsalver, som specielt republikanerne begejstret kastede sig ud i. Og da talen var overstået, styrtede hun ud af salen og undgik dermed at skulle give hånd til Netanyahu.
 
Præsident Obama har allerede gjort det klart, at han vil nedlægge veto imod ethvert lovforslag fra Kongressen, som forsøger at stoppe hans diplomatiske proces med Iran. Skal Kongressen derfor kunne overtrumfe et præsidentielt veto, skal den efterfølgende kunne mønstre et ”super-flertal” på to tredjedele. Det betyder, at en masse demokrater skal overbevises om at stemme for et sådant lovforslag, og dermed imod deres egen præsident.
 
Men under sit besøg og i sin tale Benyamin Netanyahu gjorde intet for at vinde demokraternes støtte, og det får Nahum Barnea til at konkludere, at Netanyahus mål dybest set aldrig har været at torpedere Iran-aftalen, men blot at vinde stemmer op til valget hjemme i Israel, ved at få det til at se ud som om han, ene-mand-imod-verden, bravt kæmper for Israels sikkerhed.
 
Har Nahum Barnea ret, er det skræmmende, for Benyamin Netanyahu står i øjeblikket i meningsmålingerne til at vinde valget.
 
Men vinder Netanyahu, skal der mere end et formfuldendt engelsk til at få genopbygget forholdet til den amerikanske præsident og Det Hvide Hus. Derfor kan det vise sig at være nogle dyrt købte stemmer, Netanyahu har skaffet sig.
 

 
 
 
 
 
Analysis:

Netanyahu's top priority is elections, not Iran 

 
 
After his speech Netanyahu was Hero of the Day for the Republicans in Congress.

Instead of garnering the Democratic members' support in order to torpedo the Iranian nuclear deal, the prime minister's Congress speech only served to alienate them.
 
By Nahum Barnea
Yediot Ahronot/Y-Net News
March 5, 2015

 
WASHINGTON – There is one photograph hanging on the wall at the entrance to the West Wing, the White House's executive office building: It's the photo of senior Obama administration officials, headed by the American president, sitting in front of the screen, tensely waiting for an update on the killing of Osama bin Laden.
 
This is the moment Barack Obama is most proud of in his six years in the White House. He has no intention of repeating this moment when it comes to Iran. 
 
I visited the White House about an hour after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finished addressing the Congress members. Netanyahu was at his best: Clear, eloquent, self-confident, speaking American like no other Israeli politician can. 
 
One of the Likud leaders once told me that when the Likudniks hear Netanyahu giving a speech in English, they melt. It's the secret of his charm. Every Israeli thinks he can run the state better than him, but who can speak like that in English? Only Bibi. Two weeks before the elections, Netanyahu created a golden opportunity for himself to impress the voters in Israel, and utilized it to the fullest. 
 
In Washington, things look different. "A spectacle," one of the White House officials reacted to Netanyahu's speech. How angry are you, I asked him. He thought it over. It's not befitting government workers of the world's strongest power to confess to any feelings, let alone anger.
 
 
Nancy Pelosi was less than pleased with the Israeli Prime Minister's speech which she found to be an insult to the American intelligence.

But Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic minority leader in the US House of Representatives, released a particularly angry statement at the end of the speech, saying she was "saddened by the insult to the intelligence of the United States." 

It was interesting watching Pelosi during Netanyahu's speech. The press gallery in the Congress hall is located above the speaker, in front of the House members' seats. Pelosi sits in a place of honor, at the center of the floor. She arrived early, all smiles, and avoided joining the bipartisan delegation which went out to greet Netanyahu. 

At the beginning of the speech, she stood up together with her fellow Congress members and applauded after each of Netanyahu's crescendos. Later on, she chose to remain seated. An increasing number of members in the Democratic wing, which is located to the right of the speaker, chose to do the same, especially the African American Congress members. As Netanyahu's criticism against the negotiations conducted by the administration grew stronger, Pelosi's face became gloomy. When Netanyahu was done, she rushed to leave the room. 
This description is important in order to understand the significance of Netanyahu's speech in terms of the Iranian nuclear program. Netanyahu's decision to address the Congress was allegedly aimed at laying the foundations for a Congress move on the Iranian issue. White House officials are talking about two possible moves: One, a law which will step up the sanctions against Iran; two, a law which will set a deadline for an agreement. Both moves, White House officials say, will torpedo the possibility of reaching an agreement with Iran. The president has already announced that he will veto such an initiative. the houses of Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds "super" majority. 
 
 
At least Netanyahu speak an elequent English, that impresses his voters back in Israel.

In other words, in order to torpedo the agreement, Israel needs the support of a large number of 

Democratic members of the House. Netanyahu's speech Tuesday did not recruit the Democrats, but rather alienated them. See, for example, the response of Pelosi, a prominent Israel supporter. This leads to the conclusion is that Netanyahu's top priority on Tuesday was not the Iranian centrifuges, but rather the polls in Israel. 

As promised, the Congress hall was jam-packed. A hidden hand made sure to fill the absent members' seats. The galleries were also full. They were filled by the Jewish billionaires, Netanyahu supporters, leaders of Jewish organizations and other invitees. The enthusiastic sounds heard by television viewers in Israel did not come from the elected representatives on the floor, but from the guests in the gallery. 
 
Nonetheless, the members of the two Houses of Congress greeted Netanyahu with a lot of affection, way beyond the protocol, way beyond acceptable courtesy. This applies mainly to the Republican side: Netanyahu is one of their own. But it also applies to many Democrats.
 
From the gallery, the Jewish billionaires supervised their protégés on the floor bellow. They came to see the fruit of their investment with their own eyes. American politics is currently controlled by the big money. The billionaires have failed to elect a president yet, but they have a huge influence on the election of presidential candidates and on the way senators and House of Representative members vote. 
 
 
House Democratic minority leader Nancy Pelosi angrily storm out of the Congress after Netanyahu's speech escaping the obligatory handshake.

It's what my colleague, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, calls "Sheldon's world," referring to Sheldon Adelson, the gambling mogul from Las Vegas. Friedman says there is a huge gap between Sheldon's world and the real world. The Congress members, who live on the donations of Adelson and others, applaud according to the orders they receive from the gallery, but the American public opinion lives according to a different agenda. 
 
Netanyahu's speech, which created quite a lot of excitement in Israel, was broadcast in America only on the cable networks, and disappeared from the headlines within an hour. It also disappeared from the Congress members' agenda. They had other issues to discuss: The homeland security budget, Hillary Clinton's security flap, etc. 
 
The round of talks with the Iranian delegation at the foreign ministerial level reached its final stages Tuesday. Secretary of State John Kerry will return to the US on Thursday, but the technical team will continue the talks. 
 
The White House official I spoke to told me that President Obama was determined to reach a political agreement, meaning a framework agreement, by March 24, or at least by the end of March. It's still unclear whether there will be an agreement, but progress has been made. It seems the Iranians are willing to commit to a continuation of the supervision of their nuclear program even after the 10 years or more that will be set as the agreement's expiration date. 
 
Snow is still covering the edges of Washington's pavements. The winter is refusing to end. The impression left by Netanyahu's speech, it seems, will dissipate far faster than the snow.
 

 
 
Link to the Barnea commentary in Yediot Ahronot.
 
 
 
 


 
Tilføj kommentar